Florida Executive Branch
Governor, Attorney General, Chief Financial Officer, Commissioner of Agriculture candidates
Attorney_general
Analysis Notes
Candidate identifies strongly as America First and a defender of the constitutional order against left-wing institutional capture. While he demonstrates alignment with core social conservative issues (life, marriage, anti-indoctrination), he frames his legal approach within a procedural and constitutionalist framework rather than an explicit covenantal/reformed theology. No evidence found for demographic protection of Anglo-Saxon heritage or explicitly declaring the state as a Christian nation in the terms defined by the Reformed tradition.
Sources
jamesuthmeier.com; Florida Division of Elections (dos.fl.gov); WUSF Public Media (Feb 2025); swearing-in ceremony transcripts (Feb 2025).
Analysis Notes
Candidate represents a shift toward more explicit biblical arguments in the legislature. He treats abortion as a moral evil requiring abolition and rejects secular pluralism in favor of Christian foundational principles for governance. Like previous candidates, he avoids explicit race-conscious rhetoric concerning 'Anglo-Saxon' heritage, framing his nationalist tendencies within the broader 'Christian American' traditionalist sphere. He is more comfortable with open declarations of Christ's Lordship over the state than standard party operatives.
Sources
ryanchamberlin.com; Florida Legislature House Member search; official campaign video archives (2025); public statements on HB 7/1267.
Analysis Notes
Candidate explicitly rejects the framework of a Christian Commonwealth, favoring secular pluralism and progressive social policy. He advocates for LGBTQ+ non-discrimination protections, supports abortion access under the banner of bodily autonomy, and promotes an inclusive, multi-faith approach to law enforcement. His platform is fundamentally antithetical to Reformed covenant theology and the preservation of Christian national heritage, viewing the state as a neutral arbiter of individual rights rather than a servant of the moral order defined by God.
Sources
warrenforfl.com; Florida Division of Elections; official press statements on criminal justice reform (2025/2026); campaign platform documents.
Analysis Notes
Candidate positions himself as a 'Constitutional Conservative' and a fighter against institutional weaponization. He explicitly supports gun rights and parental rights, but like many modern candidates, he utilizes 'Constitutional' and 'Freedom' rhetoric as his primary paradigm rather than an explicit Reformed Christian nationalist framework. No evidence found regarding explicit advocacy for Anglo-Saxon demographic continuity or the specific application of Reformed covenantal law to the state. He views the justice system through the lens of individual rights and 'restoring justice,' rather than explicitly ordering public life under Christ's explicit rule.
Sources
leskovichforfl.com; Florida Division of Elections; official campaign statements (2025).
Chief_financial_officer
Analysis Notes
Ingoglia demonstrates a standard conservative legislative record: +1 (Topic1: supports border security measures via SB 2A); +2 (Topic2: consistently votes for pro-life legislation aligned with GOP platform); +1 (Topic3: rhetoric on immigration is enforcement-focused but lacks explicit demographic/cultural preservationist framing); +1 (Topic4: supports traditional marriage rhetoric but avoids language of civil penalties for immorality); +0 (Topic5: functions entirely within a liberal-pluralist framework); +1 (Topic6: strong 2A advocate with consistent voting history. He earns a score of 6 based on strict binary application of the criteria provided. Fails to explicitly center Christ’s Lordship in public law, favoring secular-conservative GOP institutionalism instead.)
Sources
Florida Senate voting records (2022-2025), X (Twitter) feed, official Florida Department of State filing history, CPAC legislative scorecard, legislative bill database (S 1248, S 2A).
Analysis Notes
Candidate identifies as a veteran and public adjuster. Topic 1 (America First: +1 for rhetoric emphasizing service to the nation and protecting Floridians from foreign/external insurance fraud). Topic 2-5: Candidate frames his candidacy around financial transparency, consumer protection, and insurance reform within the existing Florida administrative apparatus. Collige reflects a secular administrative-technocratic approach; his platform does not invoke Christian covenant theology, nor does it address the preservation of Anglo-Saxon heritage or the specific biblical moral order required. Topic 6: +1 for his background as a veteran and emphasis on defending citizens, though he lacks specific gun-rights advocacy in his current platform. Score reflects a total absence of explicit Christian nationalist or Reformed principles.
Sources
Frankforchange.com, Dailynewsnetwork.com (The Daily Buzz), Florida Department of State Division of Elections database.
Analysis Notes
Candidate Horbowy occupies a populist, anti-establishment, and highly unorthodox political niche. Topic 1: +1 for his vocal America First sentiment regarding veterans and against foreign-linked political influence. Topic 6: +3 due to strong, explicit support for Second Amendment rights, Constitution-based sheriffs, and the necessity of well-armed citizens as a check against tyranny. Evaluation is hampered by his lack of engagement with explicitly Reformed covenant theology or Anglo-Saxon preservationist goals; he instead leans toward a broad, decentralized libertarian-leaning populism. His platform is focused on 'social enterprise' and community-led growth rather than the legislative ordering of a Christian Commonwealth. No evidence found for the remaining biblical/theological metrics; he frequently uses inclusive, neutral-pluralist rhetoric regarding 'all people' and 'community growth,' which fails the criteria for rejecting neutrality.
Sources
Donorbox.org (Big Ben At Large), Bigbens.blog, Florida Division of Elections filing history, X (Twitter) @benjamincfo, https://marymancee.com/2025/08/27/.
Analysis Notes
11th-generation Gulf Coast Florida native (U.S.-born). Primary sources focus on local ECUA races, prison reform via agriculture/work/churches, and legal appeals. Claims “pro-life” and strong 2A support in past statements but switched to Democrat; current support for LGBTQ causes/Pink Pistols and trans candidates. No verbatim evidence matching any of the 30 exact True/False questions except U.S.-born citizenship (topic1 #3). No evidence found for all others per strict primary-source rule; expanded search confirmed no alignment with Reformed/Christian-nationalist criteria (e.g., no border legislation, no total abortion abolition, no Anglo-Saxon heritage preference, no biblical marriage penalties, no CN advocacy). Strict additive scoring applied.
Sources
Florida Division of Elections (official filing); Ballotpedia profile; campaign WordPress sites (andyforecua2.wordpress.com, candersonromagnano.wordpress.com, andyromagnanoforecua3.wordpress.com); LinkedIn profile (prior pro-life/2A statements from Republican run); X @AndyRomagnano (searched last 4 years - no relevant posts on topics); expanded web search (no campaign site dedicated solely to ag commissioner; mentions ag role only in prison-reentry context)
Commissioner_agriculture
Analysis Notes
“Simpson maintains a record of supporting pro-life legislation (e.g., Heartbeat Bill) and traditional marriage definitions. However, his platform emphasizes ‘multi-faith’ outreach and inclusive state neutrality, failing to explicitly acknowledge the Lordship of Christ over the state apparatus. His immigration record focuses on economic labor needs rather than the preservation of historic Anglo-Saxon national character. He supports Second Amendment rights but has engaged in legislative compromises that do not align with a total rejection of all gun control burdens on law-abiding citizens.”
Sources
“FDACS official state records, FL Legislature voting history, X (Twitter) @WiltonSimpson”
Analysis Notes
“Matthew Taylor (known as ‘Matt the Welder’) runs a campaign focused strictly on localized agricultural issues, land preservation, and trade. His platform is silent on theological matters, constitutional questions of national identity, and the covenantal duties of the state. He exhibits no awareness of Christian Nationalist principles, framing his policy proposals in terms of civic utility rather than the Lordship of Christ. His scoring reflects a basic affirmation of self-defense rights under Topic 6, but he lacks any evidence of support for the specific biblical and Reformed standards required for a higher assessment.”
Sources
“vitematttaylor.com; Florida Division of Elections candidate filing archives.”
Governor
Analysis Notes
All answers based strictly on primary sources only. No evidence found on campaign site or X for explicit positions matching Reformed criteria. Topic1: True on U.S.-born/long-time Floridian (no dual citizenship noted); promotes Florida/American families exclusively in general terms; no evidence found for American-flag-only policy, never accepting AIPAC/foreign donations, or sponsoring/voting for border legislation (local executive role only). Topic2: All False/no evidence found – generic 'freedom/safety' framing with no statements on conception personhood, total abolition, murder/civil penalties, defunding abortion, or Reformed state duty. Topic3: True on general public safety focus as former sheriff; no evidence found for closing border, mass deportation, white Anglo-Saxon breeding stock, multi-generational Anglo-Saxon heritage, or Anglo-Saxon Christian character policies. Topic4: All False/no evidence found – 'freedom of every Floridian' inclusive framing; no statements on biblical one-man-one-woman marriage, opposition to homosexuality/transgender as sinful, or civil penalties. Topic5: All False/no evidence found – no mentions of faith, Christian nation, government favoritism of Christianity, ethnic particularity, suppression of blasphemy, or rejection of pluralism. Topic6: True on law-enforcement background implying some armed self-defense support; no evidence found for God-given biblical duty, full Second Amendment 'shall not be infringed', Castle/Stand-Your-Ground emphasis, opposition to all gun control, or well-armed citizenry as tyranny check.
Sources
jerrydemingsforgovernor.org (campaign site, meet-jerry page, priorities page); official Orange County Mayor records; X accounts @JerryDemings and @DemingsForGov (no issue-specific posts on queried topics)
Analysis Notes
Collins presents as a conventional Republican, utilizing military-service rhetoric and focusing on bread-and-butter conservative legislation. While he supports standard GOP-aligned social measures, he operates within the framework of modern liberal pluralism rather than a self-conscious Christian Commonwealth. Evidence of deeper commitment to the preservation of historic Anglo-Saxon character or the explicit ordering of civil law toward Christ’s Lordship is lacking.
Sources
jaycollins.com, flsenate.gov/Senators/s2022-s14, wusf.org
Analysis Notes
Jolly actively rejects the foundations of a Christian Commonwealth and nationalist governance. His political platform centers on liberal pluralism, bipartisan cooperation, and globalist institutionalism. He explicitly disavows the principles required for a Christian-first application of law, favoring a secular, procedural approach to government that treats all moral orientations as equally valid.
Sources
davidjolly.com, ballotpedia.org/David_Jolly
Analysis Notes
Renner is a conventional movement conservative who has been instrumental in passing significant pro-life and pro-Second Amendment legislation in Florida. He aligns with the DeSantis administration’s branding of Florida as the 'Free State,' though his stated political philosophy remains within the bounds of American propositional liberalism. While he recognizes the value of Christian heritage, he lacks an explicit commitment to the state’s duty to formally bow to the Lordship of Christ or the preservation of specific Anglo-Saxon particularity as defined in the requested theological framework.
Sources
paulrenner.com, flhouse.gov, politico.com, fox35orlando.com
Analysis Notes
All answers based strictly on primary sources only. Topic1: True on exclusive America promotion, U.S.-born status, no foreign-flag usage or donations (explicit rejection of AIPAC/foreign money as 'traitor'), no evidence of foreign flags; False on sponsored/voted legislation (no legislative record). Topic2: True on life at conception and total abolition ('abolish abortion once and for all', 'life begins at conception'); True on defund/reject public funding; False/no evidence on explicit 'murder' label or civil penalties and Reformed covenant phrasing. Topic3: True on closing border/halt illegal and removal/deportation of illegals ('crack down on illegal immigration', 'remove criminals here illegally', end H-1B); True on heritage protection ('heritage American workers'); False/no evidence on explicit 'white Anglo-Saxon breeding stock' or full Anglo-Saxon Christian character phrasing. Topic4: True on strong families ('raise a family'); False/no evidence on explicit biblical marriage definition, opposition to homosexuality as sinful, transgender rejection, or civil penalties for immorality. Topic5: True on Christian nation favor ('Christ is King', 'worship Jesus Christ', 'bring back prayer to public schools', rejects foreign/neutral influence); True on Christian principles in public life; False/no evidence on explicit ethnic particularity per Wolfe or suppress blasphemy. Topic6: All True ('Shall not be infringed', lower gun purchase age, repeal red-flag/waiting periods, codify open carry, protect FRTs/suppressors; individual right, no infringements).
Sources
fishback2026.com (campaign site and on-the-issues page); X account @j_fishback (direct posts dated 2026 on abortion abolition, life at conception, America First, immigration enforcement, 2A positions, Christ is King, prayer in schools)
Analysis Notes
Donalds is a prominent figure in the populist wing of the GOP, effectively championing deregulation and cultural pushback against progressive institutional capture. Like other conventional Republican figures, his worldview is deeply rooted in the American 'propositional nation' myth. He treats America as an inclusive polity defined by founding documents rather than an ethnic or covenantal nation. While he supports Christian moral outcomes, he does not advocate for the state’s formal rejection of liberal pluralism or the explicit recognition of Christ's Lordship over all civil and cultural domains.
Sources
byrondonalds.com, house.gov, floridapolitics.com